Tag Archive for: Azure Solutions Architect

Enhancing Global App Deployment with Azure Traffic Manager

Embarking on the path to enhanced global application deployment demands a nuanced understanding of how to effectively distribute network traffic to maintain optimal performance and availability. Today, I will dive deep into implementing Azure’s Traffic Manager, an innovative global DNS load balancer developed by Microsoft Azure. This tool is instrumental in distributing network traffic across several endpoints, such as Azure web apps and VMs (Virtual Machines), ensuring that applications retain high availability and responsiveness, particularly when deployed across multiple regions or data centers.

Prerequisites

  • Azure Subscription
  • At least two Azure Web Apps or VMs (Refer to Azure’s official guide for creating Azure web apps.)

Use Cases

  • Global Application Deployment
  • High availability and responsiveness
  • Customized Traffic Routing

Benefits

  • Enhanced scalability and flexibility
  • Improved application availability
  • Cost-effective solution

Azure Traffic Manager Implementation Steps

Step 1: Creation of Azure Web Apps

Begin by establishing Azure Web Apps in two distinct regions. For the purpose of this demonstration, these configurations are pre-established. It’s crucial to ensure that your web application SKU is compatible with Azure Traffic Manager, selecting the Standard S1 with 100 total ACU and 1.75 GB memory for this instance.

Step 2 & 4: Application Browsing

To demonstrate this, simply browse your application, ensuring that one application is operational in regions like East US and another in West Europe.

Azure Traffic Manager Implementation

To set up the Traffic Manager, navigate to the Azure marketplace and search for the Traffic Manager Profile. Choose a distinct name for the Traffic Manager; in this scenario, ‘trafficmanager2451’ is used. Opt for the Priority routing method to obtain augmented control over the distribution of traffic. Notably, the Traffic Manager profile’s region does not necessitate specification here, as it is a global service.

Endpoints Configuration

Moving to the ‘Endpoint’ section, configure two endpoints:

  1. Endpoint 1: Set as Azure Endpoint with a unique name, designating ‘App Service’ as the Resource Type and specifying the first App Service. Assign a priority (e.g., 1 for the primary).
  2. Endpoint 2: Similarly, establish another Azure Endpoint, selecting ‘App Service’ for the Resource Type and indicating the second App Service while setting a subsequent priority (e.g., 2).

Setting the Protocol and Verifying Endpoints

Under the Traffic Manager settings tab, select ‘Configuration’. Set the Protocol to HTTPS with port 443, enabling the Traffic Manager to facilitate secure communications. Proceed to verify that the endpoints are now online and operational, allowing successful browsing of the application through the Traffic Manager URL.

Application Browsing using Traffic Manager URL and Validation

To further validate, momentarily stop the East US web app, then browse the application utilizing the Traffic Manager URL. This operation confirms the Traffic Manager profile’s functionality by successfully redirecting to the West Europe region app, evidencing the effective distribution of traffic.

Conclusion

The implementation of the Traffic Manager with prioritized routing has been executed with precision, as evidenced by the seamless redirection to the West Europe region app upon halting the East US web app. This not only confirms the Traffic Manager’s operational success but also highlights its capability to ensure high availability and efficient traffic distribution across global applications.

/0 Comments/by

Solving Cookie Setting Challenges in Web Applications

Overcoming the Cookie Setting Challenge in Modern Web Applications

Throughout my career in technology, particularly during my time at DBGM Consulting, Inc., I’ve encountered numerous intricate challenges that necessitate a blend of innovative thinking and a solid grasp of technical fundamentals. Today, I’m delving into a common yet perplexing issue many developers face when deploying web applications using contemporary frameworks and cloud services. This revolves around configuring cookies correctly across different environments, a scenario vividly illustrated by my endeavor to set cookies in a Next.js and Django application hosted on Azure and accessible via a custom domain.

The Core Issue at Hand

In the digital realm of web development, cookies play a vital role in managing user sessions and preferences. My challenge centered on a Next.js frontend and a Django backend. Locally, cookies functioned flawlessly. However, the deployment on Azure using a personal domain, namely something.xyz, introduced unforeseen complexities. Despite meticulous DNS configuration—assigning the frontend and backend to an A record and a CNAME respectively—cookie setting faltered in the production environment.

Detailed Analysis of the Problem

The primary goal was straightforward—utilize Django’s session storage to manage cookies within the browser. Nonetheless, the adjustment from localhost to a live Azure-hosted environment, compounded by a switch to a custom domain, thwarted initial efforts. A closer inspection via the browser’s network tab revealed a poignant message:

csrftoken=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Domain=[‘something.xyz’]; expires=Mon, 03 Feb 2025 22:41:48 GMT; Max-Age=31449600; Path=/; SameSite=None; Secure this attempt to set a cookie via a Set-cookie header was blocked because its domain attribute was invalid with regards to the current host url.

This error underscored a critical misconfiguration pertaining to domain settings, particularly affecting csrf and sessionid cookies. The troubleshooting process involved various adjustments to the SESSION_COOKIE_DOMAIN and CSRF_COOKIE_DOMAIN settings in Django, exploring permutations including the root domain and its subdomains.

Reflecting on Solutions

The journey towards resolution emphasized a key lesson in web development: the importance of environment-specific configuration. It became apparent that traditional cookie setting methods necessitated refinement to accommodate the nuances of cloud-hosted applications and custom domains.

  • Technical Precision: Ensuring the correct format and scope of domain settings in cookie attributes is paramount.
  • Adaptability: The transition from a development to a production environment often reveals subtle yet critical discrepancies that demand flexible problem-solving approaches.
  • Security Considerations: Adjusting SESSION_COOKIE_SAMESITE and CSRF_COOKIE_SAMESITE settings requires a delicate balance between usability and security, especially with the advent of SameSite cookie enforcement by modern browsers.

In reflecting on this challenge, the utilization of tokens emerges as a viable alternative, potentially sidestepping the intricacies of domain-specific cookie setting in distributed web applications. This approach, while different, underscores the necessity for continual adaptation and learning in the field of web development and cloud deployment.

Conclusion

The path to resolving cookie setting issues in a complex web application environment is emblematic of the broader challenges faced in the field of technology consulting and development. Such experiences not only enrich one’s technical acumen but also foster a mindset of perseverance and innovative thinking. As we navigate the evolving landscape of web technologies and cloud deployment strategies, embracing these challenges becomes a catalyst for growth and learning.

Focus Keyphrase: cookie setting challenges in web applications

/0 Comments/by
Link to: Get in touch

Let’s collaborate!

Contact Me

DAVID MAIOLO

 The content on this website, including text, photographs, and any other media, is the property of David Maiolo unless otherwise noted. No part of this website may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the owner.

DISCLAIMER

The information provided on this website is for general informational purposes only. While I strive to keep the information up-to-date and correct, I make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will I be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website. *This website may include links to other websites which are not under the control of David Maiolo. I have no control over the nature, content, and availability of those sites.

© 2024 David Maiolo